problems

[Leonore Reiser]

Yes- thats the other bug I mentioned- turns out this was a problem for
others as well. As I said- I will re send a version w/o the problems (
till I knew what was going on I had to hand edit back to a 'normal state'.

I have to meet someone right now and will respond to the latter part ( and
send update) when I am done.
Leonore

On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Pankaj Jaiswal wrote:

> Hi Leonore,
>
> Thanks for the update
>
> There is one more bug in the term "pollen sac", the Xref ISBN is shoing up in
> the ontology file instead of the Definition.
>
> I remember sending some e mail on the development stages. I am a little confused
> on how to define and curate development stages Vs Growth stages. It seems that
> both  are either same (actually not !) or overlap, as it appears from TAIR
> (yours) when the definitions suggest about meristem etc.
>
> and
> MaizeDB e.g.
>   %reproductive phase
>    %gametophyte development
>     %pollen development
>     %embryo sac development . What i am trying to do is have 3-4 categories
>
> growth /development stages (select which is more appropriate)
> 1. Germination (the physiology is different from the vegetative, includes
> imbibition-radicle-coleoptile emergence)
> 2. Vegetative (seedling to flowering)
> 3. Reproductive (flowering to death of plant or fertilization)
> 4. Maturity (Embryonic for TAIR and linear grain filling from MaizeDB), includes
> post fertilization and seed maturity)
>
> Rice is definitely in a not so good situation, since the stages are not defined
> at the microlevel. I tried to fit in the defined stages in the above 3-4
> categories. let me know of your suggestions.
>
> pankaj
>
> Leonore Reiser wrote:
> >
> > Pankaj
> > Yes- this turns out to be a bug in the software that wont save the
> > changes. the % relationship:
> > % adult leaf.... through the end of the line needs to be deleted... I can
> > send a (hopefully) cleaned up version of the ontology and definitions...
> > turns out others were having the same problem.. this was the one I
> > mentioned in the email.
> > Leonore
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Pankaj Jaiswal wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Leonore,
> > >
> > > I am having some problem with your files. the bug is as follows. pl. let me know
> > > about the correct relationship
> > >
> > > pankaj
> > >
> > >  The parentage relationship given contradicts an earlier statement of this
> > > relationship.
> > >        <leaf vascular system ; GO:0000429 < adult leaf ; GO:0000323 % adult leaf
> > > ; GO:0000323 < leaf ; GO:0000555
> > >                                                                     ^
> > >
> > >  The parentage relationship given contradicts an earlier statement of this
> > > relationship.
> > >       <leaf vascular system ; GO:0000429 < adult leaf ; GO:0000323 % adult leaf
> > > ; GO:0000323 < juvenile leaf ; GO:0000551
> > > --
> > >
> *
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leonore Reiser, Ph.D.                   lreiser at acoma.stanford.edu
The Arabidopsis Information Resource	FAX: (650) 325-6857
Carnegie Institution of Washington	Tel: (650) 325-1521 ext. 311
Department of Plant Biology		URL: http://arabidopsis.org/
260 Panama St.
Stanford, CA 94305
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------