Pulvinus

[Mary (Polacco) Schaeffer]

> Thanks much Chih-Wei.
> You might wish also to look also at the discussions in our archives which I
> found by Google.
>  m
> 
> Hi Mary,
> 
> I didn't see "pulvinus" in the current PO.  I just set up a request for this
> term in the SourceForge's PO tracker, so we can have opinions from other
> experts. 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1695236&group_id=7683
> 4&atid=835555
> 
> Chih-Wei
> 
> 
> On Apr 5, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Mary (Polacco) Schaeffer wrote:
> 
>>  Dear Chih-Wei  --PO-Editor  -- right?
>>  
>>  Looking to link the legacy MaizeGDB anatomy terms not yet used for
>> annotation at MaizeGDB, to an accession in PO I need some help with
>> 'pulvinus'. Is it simply part of the node?
>>  
>>  Discussion about Dec 2004 indicated this was part of Œnode¹ - do you know if
>> that is considered appropriate for now? If so, should we add pulvinus in the
>> definition or comment part of the term?
>>   mary  
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://brie4.cshl.edu/pipermail/po-dev/attachments/20070405/14f9f30b/attachment.html>