<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: Pulvinus</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'>Thanks much Chih-Wei.<BR>
You might wish also to look also at the discussions in our archives which I found by Google.<BR>
m<BR>
<BR>
Hi Mary,<BR>
<BR>
I didn't see "pulvinus" in the current PO. I just set up a request for this term in </SPAN></FONT><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'><FONT FACE="Helvetica, Verdana, Arial">the SourceForge's PO tracker, so we can have opinions from other experts. <BR>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><a href="http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1695236&group_id=76834&atid=835555">http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1695236&group_id=76834&atid=835555</a><BR>
<BR>
Chih-Wei<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On Apr 5, 2007, at 3:43 PM, Mary (Polacco) Schaeffer wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN><BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"> Dear Chih-Wei --PO-Editor -- right?<BR>
<BR>
Looking to link the legacy MaizeGDB anatomy terms <I><U>not yet used for annotation</U></I> at MaizeGDB, to an accession in PO I need some help with 'pulvinus'. Is it simply part of the node?<BR>
<BR>
Discussion about Dec 2004 indicated this was part of ‘node’ - do you know if that is considered appropriate for now? If so, should we add pulvinus in the definition or comment part of the term?<BR>
mary <BR>
</FONT></SPAN></BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR>
<BR>
</FONT></SPAN></BLOCKQUOTE><SPAN STYLE='font-size:12.0px'><FONT FACE="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><BR>
</FONT></SPAN>
</BODY>
</HTML>