making it easier for databases to use the PO

[Mary Polacco]

Hi all

Is there any reason not to post a list of the PO accessions and the terms,
alphabetically - ie no ontology structure?

It makes it easier for database folks such as myself both to retrofit, and
use the approved terms and their the accession IDs.

Attached is a list - from last fall, the CVS dump of terms with accessions
and ontology structure, that I used to help map to MaizeGDB. Missing terms,
eg synonyms for husk, I mapped using the PO AmiGO browser.  It should be
trivial for a regular update of this sort to be dumped from the AmiGO
database.

  mary

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: POID_2004.txt
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 74208 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://brie4.cshl.edu/pipermail/po-dev/attachments/20050125/924f6806/attachment.obj>