SSR markers location in the rice genome

[Susan McCouch]

Dear Marco,

Please see Supplemental Table 17 in the attached publication.  This  
table gives physical locations of all 18,000 annotated SSRs in the  
rice genome, along with other relevant information about the markers  
and SSR loci.

Regards,
Susan McCouch

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: IRGSP_Rice_Genome_Nature.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 246545 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://brie4.cshl.edu/pipermail/gramene/attachments/20070108/ce416e5e/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------


On Jan 8, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Marco Pessoa Filho wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> I need to determine the location of a large number of SSR loci in the
> rice genome, in basepairs in each rice chromosome. Is there a  
> better way
> to do this than to perform individual searches for each marker on the
> web version of Gramene? Some downloadable dump of this kind of
> information, for instance, for the markers I'm interested in.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Marco
>
> ___________________________
>
> Aviso de confidencialidade:
>
> - Esta mensagem da Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecu?ria  
> (Embrapa), empresa p?blica federal regida pelo disposto na Lei  
> Federal n? 5.851, de 7 de dezembro de 1972, ? enviada  
> exclusivamente a seu destinat?rio e pode conter informa??es  
> confidenciais, protegidas por sigilo profissional. Sua utiliza??o  
> desautorizada ? ilegal e sujeita o infrator ?s penas da lei. Se  
> voc? a recebeu indevidamente, queira, por gentileza, reenvi?-la ao  
> emitente, esclarecendo o equ?voco.
>
> Confidentiality note:
>
> - "This message from Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecu?ria  
> (Embrapa), a government company established under Brazilian law  
> (5.851/72), is directed exclusively to its addressee and may  
> contain confidential data, protected under professional secrecy  
> rules. Its unauthorized use is illegal and may subject the  
> transgressor to the law's penalties. If you are not the addressee,  
> please send it back, elucidating the failure".
>