A request for some fairly large tables

[Smith-White, Brian (NIH/NLM/NCBI)]

Ken,

The display on dev.gramene.org solved the problem. At the bottom of the each
page of displayed markers (for each type of marker) there is the Download
data option. This prepares a table for all members of the group - saving
this page is what I needed. If no one minds I will crawl around this site a
bit.

Brian 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ken Youens-Clark [mailto:kclark at cshl.org] 
>Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 11:53 AM
>To: Smith-White, Brian (NIH/NLM/NCBI)
>Cc: gramene at gramene.org
>Subject: Re: A request for some fairly large tables
>
>On Mar 24, 2005, at 1:45 PM, Smith-White, Brian (NIH/NLM/NCBI) wrote:
>
>> To whom this may concern,
>>
>> We are updating the plant data in the NCBI Map Viewer. We wish to 
>> enable functioning linkouts to the data-provider/current repository. 
>> To do this for the rice maps requires a number of 2, or 3, column 
>> files/tables. The query to amass the data can be achieved 
>via the web. 
>> However the amount of output exceeds the display boundaries. As an 
>> example searching for all markers (query string of "*") 
>yields ~13,000 
>> entries. If possible, could I receive files with the output 
>of an "all 
>> markers" query and the output of "all mutants" query?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Brian Smith-White
>> NCBI
>
>Brian,
>
>Since I handle the marker database for Gramene, I can easily 
>create whatever you need from that.  Note that our next 
>release will contain far more than 13K markers -- we're up to 
>almost 300K now!  See our development site for a sample:
>
>	http://dev.gramene.org/db/markers/marker_view
>
>Also, our structure has changed a bit.  We've now integrated 
>species information better on this release, so the search 
>options and resultset reflect that.
>
>	http://dev.gramene.org/db/markers/marker_view? 
>marker_name=*&marker_type_id=5&action=marker_search
>
>I would be happy to send you a tab-delimited file showing 
>marker name, synonyms, species and type for all the markers in 
>our database.  Would that be sufficient?
>
>ky
>