[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [ geneontology-AmiGO Requests-1413431 ] displaying obsotele nodes/terms]]

[Pankaj Jaiswal]

I hope the GO group will appreciate this feedback.

Pankaj



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [ geneontology-AmiGO Requests-1413431 ] displaying 
obsotele nodes/terms]
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 14:52:00 -0400
From: Peter Stevens <peter.stevens at mobot.org>
Reply-To: po-internal at plantontology.org
To: <po-internal at plantontology.org>
References: <67bf5c58a1d1d6f3b9357be916290448 at msx.umsl.edu>

I agree about obsolete - "archived" may be best. "Terms not in
current use" may be linked with "names not in current use" and so
acquire guilt through mistaken association.

P.


>I'd like to second Pankaj's request that the obsolete nodes be place 
>after the active ones. I would also like to request that the term 
>"obsolete" be replaced with something like "archived terms" or 
>"terms not in current use". The word "obsolete" has caused 
>considerable misunderstanding in the botanical community, and has 
>cost the PO a great deal of good will. People are interpreting the 
>word "obsolete" to mean "worthless" or "hopelessly old-fashioned".
>
>Toby
>
>
>On Mar 17, 2006, at 8:54 PM, Pankaj Jaiswal wrote:
>
>
>
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>
>Subject: [ geneontology-AmiGO Requests-1413431 ] displaying obsotele 
>nodes/terms
>
>Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:34:57 -0800
>
>From: SourceForge.net <noreply at sourceforge.net>
>
>To: noreply at sourceforge.net
>
>
>AmiGO Requests item #1413431, was opened at 2006-01-23 20:17
>
>Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sshu
>
>You can respond by visiting:
>
>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=494390&aid=1413431&group_id=36855
>
>
>Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
>
>including the initial issue submission, for this request,
>
>not just the latest update.
>
>Category: AmiGO 1.5
>
>Group: None
>
>Status: Closed
>
>Resolution: None
>
>Priority: 5
>
>Submitted By: Pankaj Jaiswal (pj37)
>
>Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>
>Summary: displaying obsotele nodes/terms
>
>
>Initial Comment:
>
>
>
>Compared to GO
>
>http://www.godatabase.org/cgi-bin/amigo/go.cgi?search_constraint=terms&action=replace_tree
>
>
>if you look at the PO which uses the same AMIGO browser
>
>(http://www.plantontology.org/amigo/go.cgi)
>
>
>is it possible to display the "obsolete" nodes by
>
>default at the last in the list.
>
>
>I presume the list is displayed alphabetically and it
>
>is not a problem because 'G' precedes 'O'. However this
>
>is a problem in PO db.
>
>
>Users have objected to looking at 'obsolete' at the
>
>very top.
>
>
>-Pankaj
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>Comment By: Shengqiang Shu (sshu)
>
>Date: 2006-03-17 17:34
>
>
>Message:
>
>Logged In: YES
>
>user_id=255734
>
>
>they are show last. will be in next release.
>
>
>
>Shu
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>You can respond by visiting:
>
>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=494390&aid=1413431&group_id=36855
>
>
>
>
>
>Elizabeth A. Kellogg
>
>E. Desmond Lee and Family Professor of Botanical Studies
>
>Department of Biology
>
>University of Missouri-St. Louis
>
>St. Louis, MO 63121
>
>Tel: 314-516-6217
>
>FAX: 314-516-6233
>
>http://www.umsl.edu/services/kellogg/