From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Tue Aug 1 12:19:19 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:19:19 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608011619.k71GJJRV021619@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/index.html name: angella email: angella at gmail.com organization: send_feedback: Send Clear: Clear comments: hey soorry for this :( http://www.palungjit.com/club/phentermine/ phentermine no prescription phentermine prescription phentermine free shipping cheap phentermine phentermine without prescription discount phentermine buy phentermine order phentermine From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Wed Aug 2 06:33:31 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 06:33:31 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608021033.k72AXVxf031326@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/whats_new/new.html name: Bob Mokk email: mokkie at yandax.com organization: send_feedback: Send your feedback Clear: Clear comments: Best wishes. Halamadak! From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Wed Aug 2 19:05:57 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:05:57 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608022305.k72N5v9t009204@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/index.html name: sorin email: sorin at mail.com organization: send_feedback: Send Clear: Clear comments: sorry man :( http://ourworld.cs.com/iamnnov/hydrocodone.html hydrocodone hydrocodone online buy hydrocodone order hydrocodone buy hydrocodone online hydrocodone side effects cheap hydrocodone hydrocodone cod hydrocodone prescription hydrocodone 60mg discount hydrocodone hydrocodone effects hydrocodone dosage generic hydrocodone hydrocodone abuse hydrocodone use hydrocodone info hydrocodone sale hydrocodone pill xanax buy xanax buy xanax online xanax online purchase xanax order xanax cheap xanax xanax prescription generic xanax xanax side effects xanax information xanax prescription online buy cheap xanax overnight xanax xanax cod order xanax online xanax dosage diet pill xanax xanax sale xanax drug xanax use xanax alcohol cheap xanax online discount xanax pharmacy xanax xanax side affect discount online xanax xanax description xanax effect buy cheap xanax online buy xanax now buy generic xanax buy xanax cod xanax pill online From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Wed Aug 2 21:56:52 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:56:52 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608030156.k731uqqF018781@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/index.html name: sorty email: sorty at avtomat.com organization: send_feedback: Send your feedback comments: sorty http://xoomer.alice.it/goggi/amateur-gay.html amateur gay big gay cock black gay porn black gay sex black gay free gay movie free gay pic free gay porn free gay sex free gay video free gay gay anal sex gay anal gay asian man gay asian gay ass gay bareback gay bear gay black man gay blow job gay bondage gay boy gay cartoon gay chat gay club gay cock gay com gay cowboys gay cum shot gay cum gay dating gay dick gay ebony gay fetish gay foto gay fuck gay fucking gay gallery gay group gay guys gay hard gay hardcore gay hentai gay interracial gay kiss gay kissing gay love gay male gay man fucking gay man sex gay man gay marriage gay masturbation gay movie gay muscle gay nude gay orgy gay personals gay photo gay pic gay porn gay sex story gay sex video gay sex gay single gay story gay superman gay teen boy gay teen gay twinks gay video gay web cam gay wrestling gay xxx gay his first gay sex hot gay index jaleel white gay latino gay marvin gay mature gay naked gay man naked gay sexo gay young gay boy young gay From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 07:08:52 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:08:52 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031108.k73B8ql9026033@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/index.html name: mann email: mann at manner.com organization: send_feedback: Send Clear: Clear comments: sorry man :( http://ourworld.cs.com/allrings/ringtone.html ringtone free ringtone download ringtone download free ringtone nextel ringtone polyphonic ringtone cell phone ringtone free sprint ringtone sprint ringtone free nokia ringtone t mobile ringtone nokia ringtone mp3 ringtone music ringtone free verizon ringtone free cingular ringtone free nextel ringtone free cell phone ringtone motorola ringtone free t mobile ringtone alltel ringtone free mp3 ringtone samsung ringtone maxis caller ringtone free polyphonic ringtone free motorola ringtone caller ringtone free mobile ringtone real ringtone free alltel ringtone free music ringtone free real ringtone funny ringtone downloadable ringtone mobile phone ringtone midi ringtone phone ringtone free samsung ringtone cool ringtone lg ringtone From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:23:00 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:23:00 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031623.k73GN0ei003174@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/index.html name: tprpedo email: torpedo at torpedo.com organization: send_feedback: Send your feedback comments: torpedo http://malvins.org/mature-sex/mature-teen-sex.html mature teen sex mature sex tgp mature pantie hose sex mature xxx sex free mature sex pic gallery free mature woman sex free mature sex photo mature adult sex indian mature sex mature sex orgy mature blonde sex mature big tit sex sinful mature sex mature woman sex video mature sex mpeg mature sex trailer mature sex thumbnail mature woman sex pic very mature sex drunk mature sex mature woman sex picture ma! ture woman anal sex mature wife sex mature cock lover sex clip russian mature sex free and mature and xxx and sex pure mature sex mature sex image mature sex links mature vs young sex mature old man sex mature older woman sex euro mature sex mature ebony sex mature woman sex story mature sex video clip mature woman sex photo mature female sex mature woman looking for sex mature sex vids busty mature sex free mature sex thumb mature woman young man sex milf mature sex elderly hot mature se! x swinge r woman google mature sex old mature woman sex mature woman free sex pic mature sex video sample hairy mature sex japanese mature sex real mature sex mature reality sex mature woman sex gallery mature woman porn mature porn star free mature porn movie mature porn movie mature porn gallery mature porn video mature porn site free mature porn video free mature porn pic free mature porn gallery mature lesbian porn mature porn clip mature porn pic mature b! lack por n mature asian porn free mature porn clip mature gay porn free mature porn picture mature porn picture mature amateur porn mature and young porn free mature woman porn mature porn tv mature milf porn mature hardcore porn en language language mature nl nl porn site mature and fat porn mature older woman porn mature adult porn free mature porn site mature porn thumb old mature porn mature reality porn mature woman in porn free mature lesbian porn interracial mature porn xxx mature porn mature lady porn mature porn trailer mature hairy porn free mature older picture porn woman mature porn links female free mature porn japanese mature porn mature porn tgp mature anal porn mature porn pay per view mature porn dvd porn hairy mature woman mature ebony porn free mature sex porn mature porn photo clothing mature porn en language language mature nl porn free mature porn thumbnail indian mature porn free mature porn trailer german mature porn free hairy mature picture porn sex russian mature porn free mature porn thumb free mature nasty porn bbw porn mature porn busty mature free mature porn tgp mature hard porn adult com mature porn free mature woman porn video mature porn post mature porn thumbnail mature man porn free mature porn links blonde mature porn hot mature porn mature woman sex porn mature taboo porn free mature black porn free mature porn video clip free mature gay porn gratuit mature porn mature black woman porn mature need porn free mature porn movie clip free mature hardcore porn mature vs young porn mature woman porn picture mature woman free porn picture mature woman porn pic mature porn preview gratis mature porn info latin mature porn rememb! er info latina mature porn remember older mature porn mature porn video clip mature teen free porn video european gallery mature porn free mature porn vids milf milf hunter milfs milf seeker mom hot moms mature women my friends hot mom From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:36:49 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:36:49 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031636.k73GanZb003385@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: naunjg at lycos.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2004/0704.html name: ttl7qf5b0l comments: v6drudghyj [URL=http://www.985640.com/181895.html] 6z201i9uct6 [/URL] 460u0473t36v7s organization: p8c3p8thh9 Clear: From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:36:49 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:36:49 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031636.k73GanIB003395@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: naunjg at lycos.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2004/0704.html name: ttl7qf5b0l comments: v6drudghyj http://www.717407.com/453750.html 460u0473t36v7s organization: p8c3p8thh9 Clear: From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:36:48 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:36:48 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031636.k73Gamqx003375@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: naunjg at lycos.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2004/0704.html name: ttl7qf5b0l comments: v6drudghyj mlha39yj7h36 [URL=http://www.985640.com/181895.html] 6z201i9uct6 [/URL] 460u0473t36v7s organization: p8c3p8thh9 From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:36:50 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:36:50 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031636.k73GaotG003405@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: naunjg at lycos.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2004/0704.html name: ttl7qf5b0l comments: v6drudghyj x8xsrdcv2u8 460u0473t36v7s organization: p8c3p8thh9 Clear: From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:36:50 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:36:50 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031636.k73GaoOM003415@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: eyjzev at lycos.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2005/subject.html name: svnym2wamy comments: kl9vucjo17ctnsye 0z9wcpbf1s [URL=http://www.432209.com/434214.html] 7bq80r08 [/URL] d5wozu1ooklbcu0 organization: 8pv040ph1n From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:36:51 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:36:51 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031636.k73Gapt2003425@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: eyjzev at lycos.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2005/subject.html name: svnym2wamy comments: kl9vucjo17ctnsye [URL=http://www.432209.com/434214.html] 7bq80r08 [/URL] d5wozu1ooklbcu0 organization: 8pv040ph1n Clear: From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:36:52 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:36:52 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031636.k73GaqBf003435@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: eyjzev at lycos.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2005/subject.html name: svnym2wamy comments: kl9vucjo17ctnsye http://www.964427.com/605413.html d5wozu1ooklbcu0 organization: 8pv040ph1n Clear: From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:36:52 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:36:52 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031636.k73GaqJm003445@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: eyjzev at lycos.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2005/subject.html name: svnym2wamy comments: kl9vucjo17ctnsye koopg2f4etl d5wozu1ooklbcu0 organization: 8pv040ph1n Clear: From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:40:38 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:40:38 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031640.k73Gecld003494@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: gwwuts at yahoo.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2004/0704.html name: w6dzv70eev comments: i8t929fu6dnmh3h [URL=http://www.699427.com/355277.html] xvwt4xeheca3xi2i [/URL] iz36fy6t5 organization: uf837h2zf6 Clear: From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:40:38 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:40:38 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031640.k73GecGi003484@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: gwwuts at yahoo.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2004/0704.html name: w6dzv70eev comments: i8t929fu6dnmh3h y4f5dzskk6v5tubk [URL=http://www.699427.com/355277.html] xvwt4xeheca3xi2i [/URL] iz36fy6t5 organization: uf837h2zf6 From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:40:40 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:40:40 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031640.k73GeeHd003524@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: oifjag at lycos.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2005/subject.html name: ohr0mg5epr comments: cvg45xrts 16xgfe0kw2 [URL=http://www.850629.com/468838.html] zprmpf0ipvb5b7 [/URL] txhlq5kc organization: 3w0f3fyo5i From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:40:39 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:40:39 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031640.k73GednQ003504@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: gwwuts at yahoo.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2004/0704.html name: w6dzv70eev comments: i8t929fu6dnmh3h http://www.683916.com/715167.html iz36fy6t5 organization: uf837h2zf6 Clear: From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:40:39 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:40:39 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031640.k73GedjG003514@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: gwwuts at yahoo.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2004/0704.html name: w6dzv70eev comments: i8t929fu6dnmh3h v0a4fpx0g8 iz36fy6t5 organization: uf837h2zf6 Clear: From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:40:41 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:40:41 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031640.k73GefDG003534@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: oifjag at lycos.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2005/subject.html name: ohr0mg5epr comments: cvg45xrts [URL=http://www.850629.com/468838.html] zprmpf0ipvb5b7 [/URL] txhlq5kc organization: 3w0f3fyo5i Clear: From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:40:42 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:40:42 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031640.k73GegiJ003554@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: oifjag at lycos.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2005/subject.html name: ohr0mg5epr comments: cvg45xrts cfn3bxxy txhlq5kc organization: 3w0f3fyo5i Clear: From feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu Thu Aug 3 12:40:41 2006 From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu (feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:40:41 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC Message-ID: <200608031640.k73Gef8X003544@filetta.cshl.org> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** email: oifjag at lycos.com send_feedback: Send your feedback refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/mailarch-dev/Apr2005/subject.html name: ohr0mg5epr comments: cvg45xrts http://www.633984.com/346700.html txhlq5kc organization: 3w0f3fyo5i Clear: From shuly at cshl.edu Fri Aug 4 16:53:44 2006 From: shuly at cshl.edu (Shuly Avraham) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:53:44 -0400 Subject: Feedback on POC References: <200608042037.k74Kb36d005772@filetta.cshl.org> Message-ID: <663EE88C-3BDF-4E3D-8033-6157610893FD@cshl.edu> > > *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** > > refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/index.html > > comments: THe difinition of lodicule for maize ear needs to be > tweaked. Currently it says: > In a Maize ear floret, one of two or three tiny scales or flaps of > tissue outside the **stamens**, possibly representing reduced > perianth segments. > > > > name: Mary Schaeffer > > email: SchaefferM at missouri.edu > > organization: > > send_feedback: Send your feedback > From kellogge at msx.umsl.edu Sat Aug 5 18:23:34 2006 From: kellogge at msx.umsl.edu (kellogge) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 17:23:34 -0500 Subject: Feedback on POC In-Reply-To: <663EE88C-3BDF-4E3D-8033-6157610893FD@cshl.edu> References: <200608042037.k74Kb36d005772@filetta.cshl.org> <663EE88C-3BDF-4E3D-8033-6157610893FD@cshl.edu> Message-ID: <4251d0d4f04f4b5c4f55462eed9cbe7e@msx.umsl.edu> How about "In a maize ear floret, one of two tiny scales or flaps of tissue outside the aborted stamens, possibly representing reduced perianth segments." Toby On Aug 4, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Shuly Avraham wrote: > >> >> *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** >> >> refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/index.html >> >> comments: THe difinition of lodicule for maize ear needs to be >> tweaked. Currently it says: >> In a Maize ear floret, one of two or three tiny scales or flaps of >> tissue outside the **stamens**, possibly representing reduced >> perianth segments. >> >> >> >> name: Mary Schaeffer >> >> email: SchaefferM at missouri.edu >> >> organization: >> >> send_feedback: Send your feedback >> > > Elizabeth A. Kellogg E. Desmond Lee and Family Professor of Botanical Studies Department of Biology University of Missouri-St. Louis St. Louis, MO 63121 Tel: 314-516-6217; FAX: 314-516-6233 http://www.umsl.edu/services/kellogg/ This message is for the designated recipient(s) only and may contain privileged or confidential information.? If you received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.? Thank you.? From shuly at cshl.edu Mon Aug 7 18:47:19 2006 From: shuly at cshl.edu (Shuly Avraham) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 18:47:19 -0400 Subject: Fwd: Feedback on POC References: <200608042037.k74Kb36d005772@filetta.cshl.org> Message-ID: <85FD1C03-21B2-464E-9502-59A5BBB43564@cshl.edu> Begin forwarded message: > From: feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu > Date: August 4, 2006 4:37:03 PM EDT > To: Shuly Avraham > Subject: Feedback on POC > > *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** > > refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/index.html > > comments: THe difinition of lodicule for maize ear needs to be > tweaked. Currently it says: > In a Maize ear floret, one of two or three tiny scales or flaps of > tissue outside the **stamens**, possibly representing reduced > perianth segments. > > > > name: Mary Schaeffer > > email: SchaefferM at missouri.edu > > organization: > > send_feedback: Send your feedback > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU Fri Aug 11 14:08:49 2006 From: katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU (Katica) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:08:49 -0700 Subject: test KI - Aug 11, 2006 Message-ID: <44DCC7B1.1040602@acoma.stanford.edu> just a test for the po at plantontology.org KI From donghui at stanford.edu Fri Aug 11 14:20:36 2006 From: donghui at stanford.edu (Donghui Li) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:20:36 -0700 Subject: test2 Message-ID: <44DCCA74.9040903@stanford.edu> test2 dh -- Donghui Li, PhD The Arabidopsis Information Resource Carnegie Institution 260 Panama Street Stanford CA 94305 donghui at stanford.edu From kjbradford at ucdavis.edu Fri Aug 11 12:00:00 2006 From: kjbradford at ucdavis.edu (KENT BRADFORD) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:00:00 -0700 Subject: FW: Compositae vocabulary Message-ID: <70B0CAB623BFDA448F85DA2AFEE8BD42DC6FF7@EXCHANGE.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu> I am trying the email that was published in Jaiswal et al (2005) in an attempt to make contact regarding the questions below. Kent Bradford _____________________________________________ From: KENT BRADFORD Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:10 PM To: 'po at plantontology.org' Subject: RE: Compositae vocabulary I am trying again to obtain a response from the plant ontology group. Kent Bradford _____________________________________________ From: KENT BRADFORD Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:13 PM To: 'po at plantontology.org' Subject: RE: Compositae vocabulary I did not get any response to the message below. Is this address listed on the Plant Ontology website viable? Kent Bradford _____________________________________________ From: KENT BRADFORD Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:33 PM To: 'po at plantontology.org' Subject: Compositae vocabulary To Whom It May Concern: I am a Co-PI on the Compositae Genome Project that has been developing EST and mapping resources for the Compositae, primarily lettuce and sunflower but now expanding into 15 additional species (http://cgpdb.ucdavis.edu). As part of this project, we have also collected extensive phenotypic data on several hundred accessions in the Compositae. We are in the process of developing a database to compile and store this data and make it accessible via our website. In describing our phenotypic data, we would like to be compatible with your controlled vocabularies in choosing our terms. However, you note on your website that these vocabularies are not yet available for the Compositae, and we have many types of data that I do not see in the current descriptions, (e.g., specific leaf shapes, rosettes, presence of trichomes, inflorescence branching patterns, etc.). I would appreciate your advice on how we should proceed in a way that will remain consistent the goals of the plant ontology project to allow broad and consistent searching on controlled vocabularies. Is anyone working on a list of terms for the Compositae that we could work from? I can send a list of the characteristics that we have recorded if it would help. Sincerely, Kent Bradford Kent J. Bradford Professor Department of Plant Sciences Mail Stop 5 One Shields Ave. University of California Davis, CA 95616-8780 Phone: 1-530-752-6087 Fax: 1-530-754-7222 Email: kjbradford at ucdavis.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kjbradford at ucdavis.edu Tue Aug 1 17:09:59 2006 From: kjbradford at ucdavis.edu (KENT BRADFORD) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:09:59 -0700 Subject: Compositae vocabulary Message-ID: <70B0CAB623BFDA448F85DA2AFEE8BD42D1B8B2@EXCHANGE.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu> I am trying again to obtain a response from the plant ontology group. Kent Bradford _____________________________________________ From: KENT BRADFORD Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:13 PM To: 'po at plantontology.org' Subject: RE: Compositae vocabulary I did not get any response to the message below. Is this address listed on the Plant Ontology website viable? Kent Bradford _____________________________________________ From: KENT BRADFORD Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:33 PM To: 'po at plantontology.org' Subject: Compositae vocabulary To Whom It May Concern: I am a Co-PI on the Compositae Genome Project that has been developing EST and mapping resources for the Compositae, primarily lettuce and sunflower but now expanding into 15 additional species (http://cgpdb.ucdavis.edu). As part of this project, we have also collected extensive phenotypic data on several hundred accessions in the Compositae. We are in the process of developing a database to compile and store this data and make it accessible via our website. In describing our phenotypic data, we would like to be compatible with your controlled vocabularies in choosing our terms. However, you note on your website that these vocabularies are not yet available for the Compositae, and we have many types of data that I do not see in the current descriptions, (e.g., specific leaf shapes, rosettes, presence of trichomes, inflorescence branching patterns, etc.). I would appreciate your advice on how we should proceed in a way that will remain consistent the goals of the plant ontology project to allow broad and consistent searching on controlled vocabularies. Is anyone working on a list of terms for the Compositae that we could work from? I can send a list of the characteristics that we have recorded if it would help. Sincerely, Kent Bradford Kent J. Bradford Professor Department of Plant Sciences Mail Stop 5 One Shields Ave. University of California Davis, CA 95616-8780 Phone: 1-530-752-6087 Fax: 1-530-754-7222 Email: kjbradford at ucdavis.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU Fri Aug 11 19:08:15 2006 From: katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU (katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: FW: Compositae vocabulary In-Reply-To: <70B0CAB623BFDA448F85DA2AFEE8BD42DC6FF7@EXCHANGE.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu> References: <70B0CAB623BFDA448F85DA2AFEE8BD42DC6FF7@EXCHANGE.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu> Message-ID: Dear Kent, I apologize for inexcusable delay in responding to your messages to po at plantontology.org. All your emails got caught in our spam filter. We will certainly try to do our best to prevent this from happening again. As Leszek already mentioned, it would help if you could send us the list of the characteristics/characters that you have recorded. This would help us understand the scope of the request. We would work together with you on incorporating botanical terms specific for Compositae in the PSO. If an extensive changes need to be done to PO to accommodate all updates, it would probably take several rounds of dialogs, and may involve taxonomists-experts for the Compositae family. A good way to start is to learn more about phenotypic data that you have and to review few examples of phenotype description, and also a list of controlled vocabulary terms that you would like to see in the PO. Best regards, Katica Ilic, POC Project Coordinator On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, KENT BRADFORD wrote: > I am trying the email that was published in Jaiswal et al (2005) in an > attempt to make contact regarding the questions below. > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > From: KENT BRADFORD > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:10 PM > To: 'po at plantontology.org' > Subject: RE: Compositae vocabulary > > I am trying again to obtain a response from the plant ontology group. > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > From: KENT BRADFORD > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:13 PM > To: 'po at plantontology.org' > Subject: RE: Compositae vocabulary > > I did not get any response to the message below. Is this address listed > on the Plant Ontology website viable? > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > From: KENT BRADFORD > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:33 PM > To: 'po at plantontology.org' > Subject: Compositae vocabulary > > To Whom It May Concern: > I am a Co-PI on the Compositae Genome Project that has been developing > EST and mapping resources for the Compositae, primarily lettuce and > sunflower but now expanding into 15 additional species > (http://cgpdb.ucdavis.edu). As part of this project, we have also > collected extensive phenotypic data on several hundred accessions in the > Compositae. We are in the process of developing a database to compile > and store this data and make it accessible via our website. In > describing our phenotypic data, we would like to be compatible with your > controlled vocabularies in choosing our terms. However, you note on your > website that these vocabularies are not yet available for the > Compositae, and we have many types of data that I do not see in the > current descriptions, (e.g., specific leaf shapes, rosettes, presence of > trichomes, inflorescence branching patterns, etc.). I would appreciate > your advice on how we should proceed in a way that will remain > consistent the goals of the plant ontology project to allow broad and > consistent searching on controlled vocabularies. Is anyone working on a > list of terms for the Compositae that we could work from? I can send a > list of the characteristics that we have recorded if it would help. > > Sincerely, > Kent Bradford > > Kent J. Bradford > Professor > Department of Plant Sciences > Mail Stop 5 > One Shields Ave. > University of California > Davis, CA 95616-8780 > Phone: 1-530-752-6087 > Fax: 1-530-754-7222 > Email: kjbradford at ucdavis.edu > > > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Katica Ilic katica at acoma.stanford.edu The Arabidopsis Information Resource Tel: (650) 325-1521 ext. 253 Carnegie Institution of Washington FAX: (650) 325-6857 Department of Plant Biology URL: http://arabidopsis.org/ 260 Panama St. Stanford, CA 94305 U.S.A. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU Mon Aug 14 14:16:49 2006 From: katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU (Katica) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:16:49 -0700 Subject: FW: Compositae vocabulary In-Reply-To: <70B0CAB623BFDA448F85DA2AFEE8BD42DC70CB@EXCHANGE.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu> References: <70B0CAB623BFDA448F85DA2AFEE8BD42DC70CB@EXCHANGE.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu> Message-ID: <44E0BE11.1020603@acoma.stanford.edu> Hi Kent, 1. Thanks for the list of terms. After brief look, I noticed that most terms are attributes of plant parts (i.e., entities or terms in the Plant Structure Ontology, abbreviated as PSO). However, PSO doesn?t include attributes or experimental conditions. Attribute (and value) terms are part of the Phenotype and Attribute ontology, PATO (URL: http://obo.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/detail.cgi?attribute_and_value). This ontology is generic and is meant to be sufficient for phenotype description across kingdoms. It is currently maintained by curators from M. Ashburner?s group, contact person is George Gkoutos, e-mail:g.gkoutos at imperial.ac.uk. 2. There are some Compositeae terms on your list that we don?t have in PSO yet, I?ll pass the list to the curator at Gramene (Pankaj Jaiswal). After August 31, someone from their group will coordinate the Plant Ontology project. 3. Also, POC ontology developers will discuss terms that I marked with red font in the attached document on our August phone conference. 4. A couple of terms on your list are already in the PSO (phyllary, PO:0009045, and leaf margin, PO:0020128). 5. Terms that include stages based on days after germination, flowering or similar, are intentionally excluded from PO. Best you can do is to replace them with terms (stages) in PO based on morphological features of the organ/plant at a particular time point depicted by counting days. 6. Regarding phenotype descriptions, TAIR, Gramene and MaizeGDB use PSO terms and free text description for describing mutant phenotypes. At TAIR, we have had a pilot project to test the description of phenotypes using several ontologies (PO, GO, PATO and perhaps some others). Also, NASC has already started using PATO (although it is not on their web site yet either). I can perhaps get some example from them too. Here is an example from TAIR pilot project, an early attempt to use PATO terms (although they were not entered with term IDs, as some terms are not yet added in PATO. Note, this is not yet displayed on TAIR web site, and is just a first trial. Also, please note that this is a description from published literature. AN EXAMPLE of a description of mutant phenotype at TAIR, using Entity, Attribute and Value model (EAV): grmplasm CS6130, allele abi3-4, locus AT3G24650, pub ref ID 5348, Description: Abscisic acid resistant, strong allele, reduced sensitivity to ABA inhibition of germination, germination of seeds only slightly inhibited by 1mM ABA; normal plant growth; seeds fail to degrade chlorophyll during maturation keeping seeds green until mature. Controlled vocabulary description: Seed coat (PO:0009088) entity: color (attribute):green (value) Seed maturation stage (PO:0007632): altered Acquisition of desiccation tolerance (GO:0048700): reduced Hope this helps. I'll get back to you after discussing this issue with the POC ontology group. Best regards, Katica KENT BRADFORD wrote: > Katica: > > Thank you for your reply. I miss messages myself these days due to spam > filters. > > I have worked on our character lists today, and have developed a draft > of how we might enter our data under your PO terms. The attached > spreadsheet has a page with all of the phenotypic characters we have (or > expect to have) data for, and the second sheet is a rough effort by me > to slot those characters under your existing terms, or indicate where it > appears that new terms may be needed. Some terms can also be cross > listed under other terms, and I have not tried to do that as yet. Am I > on the right track with this? Thanks for your assistance. > > Kent Bradford > > -----Original Message----- > From: katica at acoma.stanford.edu [mailto:katica at acoma.stanford.edu] > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 4:08 PM > To: po-dev at plantontology.org; KENT BRADFORD > Subject: Re: FW: Compositae vocabulary > > Dear Kent, > > I apologize for inexcusable delay in responding to your messages to > po at plantontology.org. All your emails got caught in our spam filter. We > will certainly try to do our best to prevent this from happening again. > > As Leszek already mentioned, it would help if you could send us the list > > of the characteristics/characters that you have recorded. This would > help > us understand the scope of the request. We would work together with you > on > incorporating botanical terms specific for Compositae in the PSO. If an > extensive changes need to be done to PO to accommodate all updates, it > would probably take several rounds of dialogs, and may involve > taxonomists-experts for the Compositae family. > > A good way to start is to learn more about phenotypic data that you have > > and to review few examples of phenotype description, and also a list of > controlled vocabulary terms that you would like to see in the PO. > > Best regards, > > Katica Ilic, POC Project Coordinator > > > On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, KENT BRADFORD wrote: > >> I am trying the email that was published in Jaiswal et al (2005) in an >> attempt to make contact regarding the questions below. >> Kent Bradford >> >> _____________________________________________ >> From: KENT BRADFORD >> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:10 PM >> To: 'po at plantontology.org' >> Subject: RE: Compositae vocabulary >> >> I am trying again to obtain a response from the plant ontology group. >> Kent Bradford >> >> _____________________________________________ >> From: KENT BRADFORD >> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:13 PM >> To: 'po at plantontology.org' >> Subject: RE: Compositae vocabulary >> >> I did not get any response to the message below. Is this address > listed >> on the Plant Ontology website viable? >> Kent Bradford >> >> _____________________________________________ >> From: KENT BRADFORD >> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:33 PM >> To: 'po at plantontology.org' >> Subject: Compositae vocabulary >> >> To Whom It May Concern: >> I am a Co-PI on the Compositae Genome Project that has been developing >> EST and mapping resources for the Compositae, primarily lettuce and >> sunflower but now expanding into 15 additional species >> (http://cgpdb.ucdavis.edu). As part of this project, we have also >> collected extensive phenotypic data on several hundred accessions in > the >> Compositae. We are in the process of developing a database to compile >> and store this data and make it accessible via our website. In >> describing our phenotypic data, we would like to be compatible with > your >> controlled vocabularies in choosing our terms. However, you note on > your >> website that these vocabularies are not yet available for the >> Compositae, and we have many types of data that I do not see in the >> current descriptions, (e.g., specific leaf shapes, rosettes, presence > of >> trichomes, inflorescence branching patterns, etc.). I would appreciate >> your advice on how we should proceed in a way that will remain >> consistent the goals of the plant ontology project to allow broad and >> consistent searching on controlled vocabularies. Is anyone working on > a >> list of terms for the Compositae that we could work from? I can send a >> list of the characteristics that we have recorded if it would help. >> >> Sincerely, >> Kent Bradford >> >> Kent J. Bradford >> Professor >> Department of Plant Sciences >> Mail Stop 5 >> One Shields Ave. >> University of California >> Davis, CA 95616-8780 >> Phone: 1-530-752-6087 >> Fax: 1-530-754-7222 >> Email: kjbradford at ucdavis.edu >> >> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Compositae phenotypes_ki_081406.xls Type: application/vnd.ms-excel Size: 44544 bytes Desc: not available URL: From lincoln.stein at gmail.com Sat Aug 12 17:17:05 2006 From: lincoln.stein at gmail.com (Lincoln Stein) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 17:17:05 -0400 Subject: Compositae vocabulary In-Reply-To: <70B0CAB623BFDA448F85DA2AFEE8BD42D1B8B2@EXCHANGE.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu> References: <70B0CAB623BFDA448F85DA2AFEE8BD42D1B8B2@EXCHANGE.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu> Message-ID: <6dce9a0b0608121417x39d4eb8ah322b234cefae53c4@mail.gmail.com> Hello Kent, We would be very happy to accept a list of terms for the Compositae. We will need the name of each term, a brief definition of the term (following the format in the existing ontology), and an indication of where in the ontology the term should be placed. Best, Lincoln On 8/1/06, KENT BRADFORD wrote: > > I am trying again to obtain a response from the plant ontology group. > > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > ***From:* KENT BRADFORD > ***Sent:* Monday, May 01, 2006 2:13 PM > ***To:* 'po at plantontology.org' > ***Subject:* RE: Compositae vocabulary > > I did not get any response to the message below. Is this address listed on > the Plant Ontology website viable? > > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > ***From:* KENT BRADFORD > ***Sent:* Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:33 PM > ***To:* 'po at plantontology.org' > ***Subject:* Compositae vocabulary > > To Whom It May Concern: > > I am a Co-PI on the Compositae Genome Project that has been developing EST > and mapping resources for the Compositae, primarily lettuce and sunflower > but now expanding into 15 additional species (***http://cgpdb.ucdavis.edu*). > As part of this project, we have also collected extensive phenotypic data > on several hundred accessions in the Compositae. We are in the process of > developing a database to compile and store this data and make it accessible > via our website. In describing our phenotypic data, we would like to be > compatible with your controlled vocabularies in choosing our terms. However, > you note on your website that these vocabularies are not yet available for > the Compositae, and we have many types of data that I do not see in the > current descriptions, (e.g., specific leaf shapes, rosettes, presence of > trichomes, inflorescence branching patterns, etc.). I would appreciate your > advice on how we should proceed in a way that will remain consistent the > goals of the plant ontology project to allow broad and consistent > searching on controlled vocabularies. Is anyone working on a list of terms > for the Compositae that we could work from? I can send a list of the > characteristics that we have recorded if it would help. > > Sincerely, > > Kent Bradford > > Kent J. Bradford > > Professor > > Department of Plant Sciences > > Mail Stop 5 > > One Shields Ave. > > University of California > > Davis, CA 95616-8780 > > Phone: 1-530-752-6087 > > Fax: 1-530-754-7222 > > Email: kjbradford at ucdavis.edu > > -- Lincoln D. Stein Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 1 Bungtown Road Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 (516) 367-8380 (voice) (516) 367-8389 (fax) FOR URGENT MESSAGES & SCHEDULING, PLEASE CONTACT MY ASSISTANT, SANDRA MICHELSEN, AT michelse at cshl.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lincoln.stein at gmail.com Sat Aug 12 17:17:05 2006 From: lincoln.stein at gmail.com (Lincoln Stein) Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 17:17:05 -0400 Subject: Compositae vocabulary In-Reply-To: <70B0CAB623BFDA448F85DA2AFEE8BD42D1B8B2@EXCHANGE.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu> References: <70B0CAB623BFDA448F85DA2AFEE8BD42D1B8B2@EXCHANGE.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu> Message-ID: <6dce9a0b0608121417x39d4eb8ah322b234cefae53c4@mail.gmail.com> Hello Kent, We would be very happy to accept a list of terms for the Compositae. We will need the name of each term, a brief definition of the term (following the format in the existing ontology), and an indication of where in the ontology the term should be placed. Best, Lincoln On 8/1/06, KENT BRADFORD wrote: > > I am trying again to obtain a response from the plant ontology group. > > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > ***From:* KENT BRADFORD > ***Sent:* Monday, May 01, 2006 2:13 PM > ***To:* 'po at plantontology.org' > ***Subject:* RE: Compositae vocabulary > > I did not get any response to the message below. Is this address listed on > the Plant Ontology website viable? > > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > ***From:* KENT BRADFORD > ***Sent:* Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:33 PM > ***To:* 'po at plantontology.org' > ***Subject:* Compositae vocabulary > > To Whom It May Concern: > > I am a Co-PI on the Compositae Genome Project that has been developing EST > and mapping resources for the Compositae, primarily lettuce and sunflower > but now expanding into 15 additional species (***http://cgpdb.ucdavis.edu*). > As part of this project, we have also collected extensive phenotypic data > on several hundred accessions in the Compositae. We are in the process of > developing a database to compile and store this data and make it accessible > via our website. In describing our phenotypic data, we would like to be > compatible with your controlled vocabularies in choosing our terms. However, > you note on your website that these vocabularies are not yet available for > the Compositae, and we have many types of data that I do not see in the > current descriptions, (e.g., specific leaf shapes, rosettes, presence of > trichomes, inflorescence branching patterns, etc.). I would appreciate your > advice on how we should proceed in a way that will remain consistent the > goals of the plant ontology project to allow broad and consistent > searching on controlled vocabularies. Is anyone working on a list of terms > for the Compositae that we could work from? I can send a list of the > characteristics that we have recorded if it would help. > > Sincerely, > > Kent Bradford > > Kent J. Bradford > > Professor > > Department of Plant Sciences > > Mail Stop 5 > > One Shields Ave. > > University of California > > Davis, CA 95616-8780 > > Phone: 1-530-752-6087 > > Fax: 1-530-754-7222 > > Email: kjbradford at ucdavis.edu > > -- Lincoln D. Stein Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 1 Bungtown Road Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724 (516) 367-8380 (voice) (516) 367-8389 (fax) FOR URGENT MESSAGES & SCHEDULING, PLEASE CONTACT MY ASSISTANT, SANDRA MICHELSEN, AT michelse at cshl.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kjbradford at ucdavis.edu Fri Aug 11 21:02:58 2006 From: kjbradford at ucdavis.edu (KENT BRADFORD) Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 18:02:58 -0700 Subject: FW: Compositae vocabulary In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <70B0CAB623BFDA448F85DA2AFEE8BD42DC70CB@EXCHANGE.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu> Katica: Thank you for your reply. I miss messages myself these days due to spam filters. I have worked on our character lists today, and have developed a draft of how we might enter our data under your PO terms. The attached spreadsheet has a page with all of the phenotypic characters we have (or expect to have) data for, and the second sheet is a rough effort by me to slot those characters under your existing terms, or indicate where it appears that new terms may be needed. Some terms can also be cross listed under other terms, and I have not tried to do that as yet. Am I on the right track with this? Thanks for your assistance. Kent Bradford -----Original Message----- From: katica at acoma.stanford.edu [mailto:katica at acoma.stanford.edu] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 4:08 PM To: po-dev at plantontology.org; KENT BRADFORD Subject: Re: FW: Compositae vocabulary Dear Kent, I apologize for inexcusable delay in responding to your messages to po at plantontology.org. All your emails got caught in our spam filter. We will certainly try to do our best to prevent this from happening again. As Leszek already mentioned, it would help if you could send us the list of the characteristics/characters that you have recorded. This would help us understand the scope of the request. We would work together with you on incorporating botanical terms specific for Compositae in the PSO. If an extensive changes need to be done to PO to accommodate all updates, it would probably take several rounds of dialogs, and may involve taxonomists-experts for the Compositae family. A good way to start is to learn more about phenotypic data that you have and to review few examples of phenotype description, and also a list of controlled vocabulary terms that you would like to see in the PO. Best regards, Katica Ilic, POC Project Coordinator On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, KENT BRADFORD wrote: > I am trying the email that was published in Jaiswal et al (2005) in an > attempt to make contact regarding the questions below. > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > From: KENT BRADFORD > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:10 PM > To: 'po at plantontology.org' > Subject: RE: Compositae vocabulary > > I am trying again to obtain a response from the plant ontology group. > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > From: KENT BRADFORD > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:13 PM > To: 'po at plantontology.org' > Subject: RE: Compositae vocabulary > > I did not get any response to the message below. Is this address listed > on the Plant Ontology website viable? > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > From: KENT BRADFORD > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:33 PM > To: 'po at plantontology.org' > Subject: Compositae vocabulary > > To Whom It May Concern: > I am a Co-PI on the Compositae Genome Project that has been developing > EST and mapping resources for the Compositae, primarily lettuce and > sunflower but now expanding into 15 additional species > (http://cgpdb.ucdavis.edu). As part of this project, we have also > collected extensive phenotypic data on several hundred accessions in the > Compositae. We are in the process of developing a database to compile > and store this data and make it accessible via our website. In > describing our phenotypic data, we would like to be compatible with your > controlled vocabularies in choosing our terms. However, you note on your > website that these vocabularies are not yet available for the > Compositae, and we have many types of data that I do not see in the > current descriptions, (e.g., specific leaf shapes, rosettes, presence of > trichomes, inflorescence branching patterns, etc.). I would appreciate > your advice on how we should proceed in a way that will remain > consistent the goals of the plant ontology project to allow broad and > consistent searching on controlled vocabularies. Is anyone working on a > list of terms for the Compositae that we could work from? I can send a > list of the characteristics that we have recorded if it would help. > > Sincerely, > Kent Bradford > > Kent J. Bradford > Professor > Department of Plant Sciences > Mail Stop 5 > One Shields Ave. > University of California > Davis, CA 95616-8780 > Phone: 1-530-752-6087 > Fax: 1-530-754-7222 > Email: kjbradford at ucdavis.edu > > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Katica Ilic katica at acoma.stanford.edu The Arabidopsis Information Resource Tel: (650) 325-1521 ext. 253 Carnegie Institution of Washington FAX: (650) 325-6857 Department of Plant Biology URL: http://arabidopsis.org/ 260 Panama St. Stanford, CA 94305 U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Compositae phenotypes.xls Type: application/vnd.ms-excel Size: 46080 bytes Desc: Compositae phenotypes.xls URL: From Leszek at missouri.edu Mon Aug 14 17:23:09 2006 From: Leszek at missouri.edu (Vincent, Leszek) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:23:09 -0500 Subject: FW: Compositae vocabulary In-Reply-To: <70B0CAB623BFDA448F85DA2AFEE8BD42DC70CB@EXCHANGE.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu> Message-ID: <2BC371D49E5C86418135172EE7C130371D279E@UM-XMAIL08.um.umsystem.edu> Hi Kent, Thanks for the copy of your "Compositae phenotypes" file you sent on Fri. - the one you've also shared with Katica. Following Katica's feedback to you earlier today, I will also work with Katica on addressing your needs so that we can provide you with a consistent/unified response. My contribution will probably be mostly in the area of terminology, because of my taxonomic expertise in the family Asteraceae/Compositae, to which you appealed in one of your several earlier communications which was 'swallowed' by an IT gremlin. We'll be in touch. Sincerely, Leszek Vincent *=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=* P. Leszek D. Vincent Ph.D., FLS Division of Plant Sciences 215 Curtis Hall University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia MO 65211-7020 USA Ph: (573) 884-3716; Skype VoIP: phytosynergy; Fax:(573) 884-7850; Email: Leszek at missouri.edu Associate Curator, Dunn-Palmer Herbarium (UMO); Research Associate, Missouri Botanical Garden (MO), USA; Plant Systematist on The Plant Ontology Consortium - NSF award 0321666 - www.plantontology.org *=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=* -----Original Message----- From: owner-po-dev at plantontology.org [mailto:owner-po-dev at plantontology.org] On Behalf Of KENT BRADFORD Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 8:03 PM To: katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU; po-dev at plantontology.org Cc: Vincent, Leszek Subject: RE: FW: Compositae vocabulary Katica: Thank you for your reply. I miss messages myself these days due to spam filters. I have worked on our character lists today, and have developed a draft of how we might enter our data under your PO terms. The attached spreadsheet has a page with all of the phenotypic characters we have (or expect to have) data for, and the second sheet is a rough effort by me to slot those characters under your existing terms, or indicate where it appears that new terms may be needed. Some terms can also be cross listed under other terms, and I have not tried to do that as yet. Am I on the right track with this? Thanks for your assistance. Kent Bradford -----Original Message----- From: katica at acoma.stanford.edu [mailto:katica at acoma.stanford.edu] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 4:08 PM To: po-dev at plantontology.org; KENT BRADFORD Subject: Re: FW: Compositae vocabulary Dear Kent, I apologize for inexcusable delay in responding to your messages to po at plantontology.org. All your emails got caught in our spam filter. We will certainly try to do our best to prevent this from happening again. As Leszek already mentioned, it would help if you could send us the list of the characteristics/characters that you have recorded. This would help us understand the scope of the request. We would work together with you on incorporating botanical terms specific for Compositae in the PSO. If an extensive changes need to be done to PO to accommodate all updates, it would probably take several rounds of dialogs, and may involve taxonomists-experts for the Compositae family. A good way to start is to learn more about phenotypic data that you have and to review few examples of phenotype description, and also a list of controlled vocabulary terms that you would like to see in the PO. Best regards, Katica Ilic, POC Project Coordinator On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, KENT BRADFORD wrote: > I am trying the email that was published in Jaiswal et al (2005) in an > attempt to make contact regarding the questions below. > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > From: KENT BRADFORD > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:10 PM > To: 'po at plantontology.org' > Subject: RE: Compositae vocabulary > > I am trying again to obtain a response from the plant ontology group. > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > From: KENT BRADFORD > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 2:13 PM > To: 'po at plantontology.org' > Subject: RE: Compositae vocabulary > > I did not get any response to the message below. Is this address listed > on the Plant Ontology website viable? > Kent Bradford > > _____________________________________________ > From: KENT BRADFORD > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:33 PM > To: 'po at plantontology.org' > Subject: Compositae vocabulary > > To Whom It May Concern: > I am a Co-PI on the Compositae Genome Project that has been developing > EST and mapping resources for the Compositae, primarily lettuce and > sunflower but now expanding into 15 additional species > (http://cgpdb.ucdavis.edu). As part of this project, we have also > collected extensive phenotypic data on several hundred accessions in the > Compositae. We are in the process of developing a database to compile > and store this data and make it accessible via our website. In > describing our phenotypic data, we would like to be compatible with your > controlled vocabularies in choosing our terms. However, you note on your > website that these vocabularies are not yet available for the > Compositae, and we have many types of data that I do not see in the > current descriptions, (e.g., specific leaf shapes, rosettes, presence of > trichomes, inflorescence branching patterns, etc.). I would appreciate > your advice on how we should proceed in a way that will remain > consistent the goals of the plant ontology project to allow broad and > consistent searching on controlled vocabularies. Is anyone working on a > list of terms for the Compositae that we could work from? I can send a > list of the characteristics that we have recorded if it would help. > > Sincerely, > Kent Bradford > > Kent J. Bradford > Professor > Department of Plant Sciences > Mail Stop 5 > One Shields Ave. > University of California > Davis, CA 95616-8780 > Phone: 1-530-752-6087 > Fax: 1-530-754-7222 > Email: kjbradford at ucdavis.edu > > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Katica Ilic katica at acoma.stanford.edu The Arabidopsis Information Resource Tel: (650) 325-1521 ext. 253 Carnegie Institution of Washington FAX: (650) 325-6857 Department of Plant Biology URL: http://arabidopsis.org/ 260 Panama St. Stanford, CA 94305 U.S.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- From pj37 at cornell.edu Thu Aug 17 11:36:01 2006 From: pj37 at cornell.edu (Pankaj Jaiswal) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:36:01 -0400 Subject: genes for grazing / harvesting wheat In-Reply-To: <200608170241.k7H2fHnv002436@greengenes.cit.cornell.edu> References: <200608170241.k7H2fHnv002436@greengenes.cit.cornell.edu> Message-ID: <44E48CE1.5060300@cornell.edu> Hi Liuling and Dave, According to the scales developed for Triticeae by Zadoks and Haun in early 1970's [Haun, J.R. 1973. Visual quantification of wheat development. Agron. J. 65: 116-119.] and [Zadoks, J.C., T.T. Chang, and C.F. Konzak. 1974. A decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14: 415-421.] and those mentioned on the site at http://www.usask.ca/agriculture/plantsci/winter_cereals/Winter_wheat/CHAPT10/cvchpt10.php the actual reproductive stage (the very initiation and differentiation of the inflorescence starts way too early. Spikelet development on the microscopic head is usually completed by the time the first node is 0.4 inches (1 cm) above the soil surface. The terminal spikelet is produced at about Zadoks stage 31. A rapid loss of younger, poorly developed tillers also normally starts at this stage (http://www.usask.ca/agriculture/plantsci/winter_cereals/Winter_wheat/CHAPT10/cvchpt10.php#stem). Probably the stage you are looking for the hollow stem is somewhat in the range of Zadoks 15-18, Zadoks 34-36. These stages are overlapping. This needs confirmation. The booting stage is very late in that sense because by that time the boot is already swollen, the inflorescence is well developed and ready to exsert out for heading stage. Therefore you will have to determine the stages for a couple of the standard cultivars and germplasms in a couple of growth conditions to see the variability. As far as I know after this evaluation you will be able to predict the desired stage by taking into account the genotype and environmental effects. You will find similar studies by McMaster GS, Wilhelm WW, Frank AB (2005) Developmental sequences for simulating crop phenology for water-limiting conditions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 1277-1288 Skiw PEJ, Jame YW, Kryzanowski L (2001) Phenological development of spring barley in a short-season growing area. Agron. J 93: 370-379 In all due respect you can use either of the Zadoks, Feekes or Haun scales as well to map your stages. Considering the Zadok scale 31 the corresponding stage defined by Plant Ontology is SE.01 one node or internode visible [PO:0007091] http://www.plantontology.org/amigo/go.cgi?view=details&show_associations=terms&search_constraint=terms&depth=0&query=PO:0007091 For other Zadok scale search the Plant Ontology for terms using 'Zadok'. The scale is listed as a synonym where ever applicable. e.g. http://www.plantontology.org/amigo/go.cgi?session_id=7417b1155827789&page=2&view=query&search_constraint=terms&depth=&query=zadok&action=query Please let me know if you need more help. I will be happy to hear you feedback. Pankaj [Plant Ontology] PS: The mail is copied to plant ontology mailing list at po-dev at plantontology.org Dave Matthews wrote: > Hi Liuling, > > Thanks for this information! This is the most unusual use of wheat I'd > ever heard of. Grazing from November thru February, then growing for grain. > > Hi Mark, > > I'm sure you know about this use. And you know a lot about phenology things > like dormancy and probably vernalization. Any thoughts? (You did say you > owe me a favor. 8) > > > I'm especially curious about the "hollow stem" stage. Google > (http://www.google.com/search?q=wheat+hollow+stem) says this is a > crucial thing for grazing/grain purposes in Oklahoma and Texas. I don't know > how the hollow stem relates to the initiation of reproduction. Evidently > this means there are stems produced in the vegetative stage but they aren't > hollow. > > We're trying to organize the growth stages of cereals into a coherent > database, the Plant Ontology. This database has nothing about hollow stem > in it yet. The closest thing (I think) is "booting" > http://www.gramene.org/db/ontology/search_term?id=GRO:0007090 > > > Hi Pankaj, > > Can you please look into whether this is significantly different and if so > how to include in the PO? > > regards, > - Dave > > > > Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:18:25 -0500 > From: "Yan, Liuling" > > Hi Dave, > > Please find my answers followed your questions. Just try to satisfy your > curiosity. Also please provide your suggestions if you have. Thank you. > > ________________________________ > > From: Dave Matthews [mailto:matthews at greengenes.cit.cornell.edu] > Sent: Tue 8/15/2006 8:22 PM > To: Yan, Liuling > Subject: re: Post for a PhD > > Hi Liuling, > > >>This advertisement says, >> >> Wheat cultivars in the southern Great Plains are used for dual purpose >> production of forage and grain, which require a longer vegetative phase for >> grazing of livestock. >> >>Interesting. I'd never heard of this. When is the grazing? Winter and >>early spring? > > > We usually start to plant seeds from September, or as early as possible, > in order to have more vegetative tissues before winter, but it cannot be > earlier than September because of lack of rainfall. Cattles are brought > to wheat field from November when plants have a lot of tissues to feed > the cattles. The cattles will be taken away from the field just before > 1st of March. > > >>When is the reproductive phase desired to begin? >>Is the reproductive phase called "booting"? (Yes I've still got a lot to >>learn about wheat.) > > > A cretirion for the wheat development is that the first hollow stem > don't elongate before 1st of March; otherwise the cattles could eat the > wheat heads. Based on this cretirion, I am thinking that we should > select strong winter varieties that have more vernalization requiremnt > and do not entry "the reproductive phase" (or the first hollow stem > never elongate before 1st March). In other word, such varieties would > have a longer vegetative phase and produce more biomass for the cattles. > > > One of the objectives in my project will be to map genes that control > vernalization duration. Two parental lines (Jagger and 2174) for the CAP > population in Oklahoma have shown different vernalization requirements: > three weeks of vernalization significantly accelerating apex development > transition for Jagger and significant vernalization effects could be > observed only after six weeks of vernalization treatment for 2174. > > Best regards > > Liuling > > -- Pankaj Jaiswal G-15, Bradfield Hall Dept. of Plant Breeding and Genetics Cornell University Ithaca, NY-14853, USA Ph. +1-607-255-3103 / 4199 fax: +1-607-255-6683 From pj37 at cornell.edu Mon Aug 21 11:36:05 2006 From: pj37 at cornell.edu (Pankaj Jaiswal) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Fwd: RE: genes for grazing / harvesting wheat] Message-ID: <44E9D2E5.3040601@cornell.edu> This a forwarded message from Yan Liuling with reference to a previous enquiry on hollow stem stage in winter wheat. -Pankaj -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: genes for grazing / harvesting wheat Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:09:54 -0500 From: Yan, Liuling To: Pankaj Jaiswal , Dave Matthews References: <200608170241.k7H2fHnv002436 at greengenes.cit.cornell.edu> <44E48CE1.5060300 at cornell.edu> Hi Pankaj (cc: Dave), Thank you very much for so much information and elaboration on it. When we talk about vernalization, we always use heading time or flowering time as outcome of vernalization. But in this particular case I need to use the elongation stage of the first hollow stem as a creterion . In practice, all winter varieties have a similar flowering time, no matter how much vernalization they require, but they have signifcant differences in reaching the elongation stage of the first hollow stem particularly in a warm winter season. Therefore differences in earlier developmental stages should explain vernalization effects much better than heading or flowering itme. In Oklahoma, when the lenght of the first hollow stem is longer than 2cM, the stem is considered detectable, which is a signal that cattles need to take away from the field. Compared with Zadoks scale it should be 31. This is what I can explain right now. Thank you again and have a nice weekend. Liuling ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: Pankaj Jaiswal [mailto:pj37 at cornell.edu] Sent: Thu 8/17/2006 10:36 AM To: Dave Matthews; Yan, Liuling Cc: Mark Sorrells; POC-dev Subject: Re: genes for grazing / harvesting wheat Hi Liuling and Dave, According to the scales developed for Triticeae by Zadoks and Haun in early 1970's [Haun, J.R. 1973. Visual quantification of wheat development. Agron. J. 65: 116-119.] and [Zadoks, J.C., T.T. Chang, and C.F. Konzak. 1974. A decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14: 415-421.] and those mentioned on the site at http://www.usask.ca/agriculture/plantsci/winter_cereals/Winter_wheat/CHAPT10/cvchpt10.php the actual reproductive stage (the very initiation and differentiation of the inflorescence starts way too early. Spikelet development on the microscopic head is usually completed by the time the first node is 0.4 inches (1 cm) above the soil surface. The terminal spikelet is produced at about Zadoks stage 31. A rapid loss of younger, poorly developed tillers also normally starts at this stage (http://www.usask.ca/agriculture/plantsci/winter_cereals/Winter_wheat/CHAPT10/cvchpt10.php#stem). Probably the stage you are looking for the hollow stem is somewhat in the range of Zadoks 15-18, Zadoks 34-36. These stages are overlapping. This needs confirmation. The booting stage is very late in that sense because by that time the boot is already swollen, the inflorescence is well developed and ready to exsert out for heading stage. Therefore you will have to determine the stages for a couple of the standard cultivars and germplasms in a couple of growth conditions to see the variability. As far as I know after this evaluation you will be able to predict the desired stage by taking into account the genotype and environmental effects. You will find similar studies by McMaster GS, Wilhelm WW, Frank AB (2005) Developmental sequences for simulating crop phenology for water-limiting conditions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 1277-1288 Skiw PEJ, Jame YW, Kryzanowski L (2001) Phenological development of spring barley in a short-season growing area. Agron. J 93: 370-379 In all due respect you can use either of the Zadoks, Feekes or Haun scales as well to map your stages. Considering the Zadok scale 31 the corresponding stage defined by Plant Ontology is SE.01 one node or internode visible [PO:0007091] http://www.plantontology.org/amigo/go.cgi?view=details&show_associations=terms&search_constraint=terms&depth=0&query=PO:0007091 For other Zadok scale search the Plant Ontology for terms using 'Zadok'. The scale is listed as a synonym where ever applicable. e.g. http://www.plantontology.org/amigo/go.cgi?session_id=7417b1155827789&page=2&view=query&search_constraint=terms&depth=&query=zadok&action=query Please let me know if you need more help. I will be happy to hear you feedback. Pankaj [Plant Ontology] From katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU Fri Aug 25 20:37:45 2006 From: katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU (katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Subject: new ontolgy updates are in the cvs, anatomy.obo rev 1.29, temporal.obo 1.28 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, New ontology updates are in the POC cvs, the following changes have ben made: po_temporal.obo file - Renamed term 'A zygote' to 'A zygotic stage' po_anatomy.obo file 1. Obsoleted following 13 subcellular terms and added a comment for each, referring to the corresponding GO subcellular term. Also, deleted old comments for some of terms (only one comment can be added) PO:0020014 columella GO:0043674 PO:0020009 ectexine GO:0043669 PO:0020010 endexine GO:0043671 PO:0020008 exine GO:0043668 PO:0020016 foot layer GO:0043670 PO:0020017 intine GO:0043678 PO:0020011 nexine GO:0043672 PO:0020059 pollen wall GO:0043667 PO:0020015 sculpture element GO:0043675 PO:0020012 sexine GO:0043673 PO:0020013 tectum GO:0043676 PO:0020018 germination pore GO:0043677 PO:0000024 filiform apparatus GO:0043680 2. added new terms under initial cell, and also under root meristem: 'root initial cell' PO:0000059, synonym: root stem cell def: Cell in the root apical meristem that by division gives rise to two cells one of which remains in the meristem, the other is added produces different root cells. 'root cortex-endodermis initial cell' PO:0000060, synonym: root cortex-endodermis stem cell def: Cell that produces root cortex and endodermis. In direct contact with quiescent center. 'lateral root-cap-epidermal initial' PO:0000061, synonym: lateral root cap-epidermal stem cell Def: Cell that produces lateral root-cap cells and root epidermis. 3. Added four new terms under 'shoot' node: 'bud' PO:0000055; def: Undeveloped shoot 'floral bud' PO:0000056, def: Bud that develops into a flower. 'inflorescence bud' PO:0000057, def: Bud that develops into an inflorescence. 'vegetative bud' PO:0000058, def: Bud that develops into a long or short shoot. 4. new term added: petal vascular system, PO:0000054. def: Vascular system of the petal. 5. Added 'meiocyte' as a synonym of the term 'sporocyte'. Best regards, Katica -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Katica Ilic katica at acoma.stanford.edu The Arabidopsis Information Resource Tel: (650) 325-1521 ext. 253 Carnegie Institution of Washington FAX: (650) 325-6857 Department of Plant Biology URL: http://arabidopsis.org/ 260 Panama St. Stanford, CA 94305 U.S.A. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU Fri Aug 25 20:51:28 2006 From: katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU (katica at acoma.Stanford.EDU) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:51:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Feedback on POC In-Reply-To: <200607271817.k6RIHBSV001790@filetta.cshl.org> References: <200607271817.k6RIHBSV001790@filetta.cshl.org> Message-ID: Hi Juliette, I updated Plant Structure Ontology earlier today, adding terms you requested in July: 'root initial cell' PO:0000059, synonym: root stem cell 'root cortex-endodermis initial cell' PO:0000060, synonym: root cortex-endodermis stem cell 'lateral root-cap-epidermal initial' PO:0000061, synonym: lateral root cap-epidermal stem cell It will take a week or so to see these updates on the POC web site. Let us know if there are other terms you would like to see in the PO. Best regards, Katica On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu wrote: > *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site *** > > refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/index.html > > comments: Hello, > > I asked this question earlier but I might have mistaken your answer for spam. I am looking for terms describing the endodermis/cortex initial and its daughter cells, are there any, if not will you make some? > > Thank you, > > Juliette > > name: Juliette Colinas > > email: jhc16 at duke.edu > > organization: Duke University/ Benfey lab > > send_feedback: Send your feedback > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Katica Ilic katica at acoma.stanford.edu The Arabidopsis Information Resource Tel: (650) 325-1521 ext. 253 Carnegie Institution of Washington FAX: (650) 325-6857 Department of Plant Biology URL: http://arabidopsis.org/ 260 Panama St. Stanford, CA 94305 U.S.A. --------------------------------------------------------------------------