Feedback on POC

[feedback_submission at filetta.cshl.edu]

    *** Feedback from Plant Ontology Live Site ***

refer_to_url: http://www.plantontology.org/index.html

comments: Hello!

I noticed that some obvious "is_a" relationships are missing...

eg: Term "adventitious root epidermis" should have an "is_a" relationship to "root epidermis";
Term "aleurone layer" should, at least (maybe not directly, but through some sub-class) have an "is_a" relationship to "Tissue"; (as far as I know)

Besides, I think that it would be better to rename the Term "obsolete growth and development terms" to "obsolete plant growth and development stage", in order to be consistent with its structural counterpart.

Thanks for reading me.
Bye

name: François DELCOUX

email: fdelcoux at ulb.ac.be

organization: ULB (Belgium)

send_feedback: Send your feedback