User's request - new term in PATO (fwd) (PR#48)
Bruskiewich, Richard (IRRI)
r.bruskiewich at cgiar.org
Fri Dec 3 02:14:28 EST 2004
How about inviting Nottingham to join the POC as a full (international)
partner, Katica, so that they can freely debate whether or not a term
belongs in PO or not, based on their own expertise...
Richard :-))?
-----Original Message-----
From: Katica Ilic [mailto:jitterbug at plantontology.org]
Sent: Friday, 2004 December 03 7:05 AM
To: simon at arabidopsis.info
Cc: po-dev at plantontology.org
Subject: Re: User's request - new term in PATO (fwd) (PR#48)
Hi Simon,
I am really not aware of any term submission procedure for the PATO. As for
the
current state of the Phenotype Attribute Ontology, you should contact Dr.
Michael Ashburner (ma11 at gen.cam.ac.uk), since his group created this
ontology
and is currently maintaining it. You can also e-mail the OBO phenotype group
(obo-phenotype at lists.sourceforge.net).
If you have new terms to suggest for the Plant Ontology, please send us the
list
of terms. We will consider thoroughly each term and will get back to you
with
the list of introduced terms and explanation in case a term may not belong
to
the Plant Structure Ontology, but rather to other Biological Ontologies (for
instance, Gene Ontology).
I would be very interested to learn more about the ontology browser you are
working on.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Best regards,
Katica
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 10:37:57 +0000
> From: Simon Jupp <simon at arabidopsis.info>
> Reply-To: po-dev at plantontology.org, Simon Jupp <simon at arabidopsis.info>
> To: po-dev at plantontology.org
> Subject: [Fwd: Need info...]
>
>
> {This message has already been sent out on the obo-phenotypes list, but
> thought it may also be relavent here as I have some terms that may need
> including in PO.}
>
> Hi,
>
> I am writing from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Center (NASC) , we are
> currently curating over 5000 phenotype descriptions using a combination
> of Plant ontology and PATO. We are using an EAV model to describe the
> various phenotypes and are finding that some of the value terms we ant to
> use are missing from PATO, we already have a list of at least 20 new
> terms that we would like including. Is there a term submission
> procedure, what is the current state of PATO?
>
> I am also working with the current GO tools and AMIGO to build an
> ontology browser and search method that combines PO and PATO. Is anyone
> else doing similar work and interested in collaboration?
>
> Cheers,
> Simon Jupp
>
> NASC,
> Nottingham,
> UK
>
> This message has been scanned but we cannot guarantee that it and any
> attachments are free from viruses or other damaging content: you are
> advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
>
>
Katica Ilic, TAIR Curator, E-mail: katica at acoma.stanford.edu
The Arabidopsis Information Resource Tel: (650) 325-1521 ext. 253
Carnegie Institution of Washington Fax: (650) 325-6857
Department of Plant Biology URL: http://arabidopsis.org/
260 Panama St.
Stanford, CA 94305, U.S.A.
More information about the Po-dev
mailing list