POC observations so far

[Pankaj Jaiswal]

In one of our earlier version, which did not go to the CVS, we had relationship 
type, develops_from for parent terms. We dropped this relationship type because 
we were not displaying it in our browser.

seed coat
nucellar cells
pericarp
megaspore
periderm
meristem
cork cambium
pistil

I agree with Felipe, we need to bring this relation_type back and use it 
extensively, wherever applicable.

Pankaj

Sue Rhee wrote:

> Sounds good. There are currently four nodes where this relationship
> resides in the Arabidopsis anatomy ontologies.
> 
> parent nodes:
> +-------------+
> | name        |
> +-------------+
> | trichoblast |
> | silique     |
> | ovary wall  |
> | L1          |
> +-------------+
> 
> Sue
> 
> 
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Felipe Zapata wrote:
> 
> 
>>Actually that relationship already exists. At least TAIR uses:
>>
>>!version: $Revision: 1.13 $
>>!type: % ISA Is a
>>!type: < PARTOF Part of
>>!type: ~ DEVELOPSFROM develops from
>>!editors: Leonore Reiser, Jonathan Clarke
>>$Arabidopsis ontology ; TAIR:0000001
>>.....
>>..
>>..
>>
>>What we probably need to do, is to go through the current ontologies and look for
>>nodes where this relationship would have more biological meaning.
>>
>>Felipe
>>