[Gramene] Re: xref_analog syntax issues, contributions?

[Erick Antezana]

Hi,

I was wondering whom (from Gramene) I should contact to, in order to
get some minor syntax problems fixed as well as discussing the
contribution procedure?

cheers,
Erick

On 29 March 2010 14:14, Erick Antezana <erick.antezana at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across a few syntax issues in the ontology file plant_trait.obo:
>
> xref_analog: EO:EO\:0007180
> xref_analog: EO:EO\:0007183
> xref_analog: EO:EO\:0007633
> xref_analog: GO:GO\:0000278
> xref_analog: GO:GO\:0007049
> xref_analog: GO:GO\:0009809
> xref_analog: GO:GO\:0010148
> xref_analog: GO:GO\:0051321
>
> The namespace is duplicated (e.g. GO:GO). It should be:
>
> xref_analog: EO:0007180
> xref_analog: EO:0007183
> xref_analog: EO:0007633
> xref_analog: GO:0000278
> xref_analog: GO:0007049
> xref_analog: GO:0009809
> xref_analog: GO:0010148
> xref_analog: GO:0051321
>
> Do you have any plans to adopt the OBO spec 1.2
> (http://www.geneontology.org/GO.format.obo-1_2.shtml)?
>
> If case we would like to contribute new terms, who would be the
> key-contact person to discuss about it? or the procedure to follow?
>
> cheers,
> Erick
>