[Fwd: FW: suggestions for 'POC' methods]
Michael Ashburner (Genetics)
ma11 at gen.cam.ac.uk
Fri Mar 22 04:15:31 EST 2002
I think I am missing something here.
In my view each independent ontology should have its own id space. The
syntax should be
<prefix>:<zero-padded-integer>
This means that a term, plus id, seen in isolation can immediately
be recognised with respect to its source ontology and there is no
risk at all of number clashes. GO uses a 7 fig digit; FB uses 9 fig
digits. DAGedit can handle both.
If groups are collaborting on building/maintaining an ontology
(a la GO) then they divide their number space (see go/numbers/go_numbers).
We then keep (eg in gobo) a register of prefixes.
What is wrong with this ?
Michael
More information about the Gramene
mailing list