[Fwd: FW: suggestions for 'POC' methods]
Pankaj Jaiswal
pj37 at cornell.edu
Wed Mar 20 10:43:01 EST 2002
Dear Everyone,
I am forwarding you an e mail from Michael, Some of you must have seen it
earlier also. There he has tried to resolve the issue of identifiers (agenda no.
2 from yesterday's conference call) and suggested to use PA "Plant Anatomy"
which is a more generic identifier. I am strongly seconding his suggestion and
would recommend using "PO" Plant Ontology instead of the PA or the identifiers
from respective databases. I would invite everyone to discuss pros and cons of
it while building up the database. It is infact has turned out to be a major
issue and should be resolved ASAP.
Thanks
Pankaj
"Michael Ashburner (Genetics)" wrote:
>
> Curious what emails cross one's desk !
>
> If I may express a view, it for option 1. BUT John Richter
> should be consulted how DAGedit will cope with mixed if prefixes.
> The thing is for option 1 is that should any one want an ontology
> just for Arabidopsis then the Zea etc specific terms could be stripped
> in a thrice with an editor.
>
> The other way is to have a generic prefix for these terms, eg. PA
> for "Plant Anatomoy" and either use these in your individual databases
> or have your own id's as synonyms.
>
> Two points, one minor.
> Not
> adult leaf sensu Arabidopsis thaliana TAIR:
> but
> adult leaf (sensu Arabidopsis thaliana) TAIR:
>
> Two, I am no botanist but could these not be made a bit broader
> eg
> (sensu Brassicae)
> (sensu Graminae)
>
> (???or sensu dicots, senu monocots) and then only go to a more
> specific sense if the biology so demands ?
>
> Hope I am not butting in when inappropriate.
>
> Michael
--
******************************************
Pankaj Jaiswal, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Associate
Dept. of Plant Breeding
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY-14853, USA
Tel:+1-607-255-3103 / Fax:+1-607-255-6683
E mail: pj37 at cornell.edu
http://www.gramene.org
******************************************
More information about the Gramene
mailing list