Plant Ontology Relationship type ?

Sun Apr 7 15:05:28 EDT 2002

Pankaj

I do not understand why you need the *-type concept at all, what is
wrong with

     <androecium ; GPO:0200002 < floret ; GPO:0200464 < flower ; GPO:0200038
      %apostemonous ; GPO:0200455
      %diadelphous ; GPO:0200388

OR
     <androecium ; GPO:0200002 < floret ; GPO:0200464 < flower ; GPO:0200038
      %apostemonous androecium ; GPO:0200455
      %diadelphous androecium ; GPO:0200388
#

      <stamen ; GPO:0200190
       %stamen_appendicular ; GPO:0200459
       %stamen_filantherous ; GPO:0200463

or

      <stamen ; GPO:0200190
       %appendicular stamen ; GPO:0200459
       %filantherous stamen ; GPO:0200463


Michael